Quantum

All who study physics today have a big knot in their head that cannot be disentangled. This knot is the weird behavior of microparticles associated with quantum mechanics that conflicts with our intuition. Let us now apply the Meether concept to disentangle it.

First let’s review the characteristics of Meether. We have already discussed previously the hierarchal control of Set Meether to matter, with each Set Meether governing its own layer of particles.(note 34) To study the relation between Set Meethers, we should apply the Set Theory in mathematics. Before a particle of matter comes into existence, all of its mass belongs to one superset. Meaning it is totally controlled by this superset. Because the Meether pressure of this superset gets larger above the saturated point, matter emerges.34 When this particle first emerges, it will have its own Set Meether, which at this time it will be in its highest level of Secondhand Energy. That means the Meether pressure of its Set Meether is at its lowest. Thus, the Set Meether’s ability to control the particle is very limited. At this point it must rely on its Superset Meether to control the particle. And to the Superset Meether, this job is easy, because before this particle emerged it was still Meether—meaning it was in perfect balance and order at a higher energy level. (How did this superset meether make the system in perfect balance? Of course, it is the simplest and most basic method: Separate all its subsets as much as possible, and follow the trend of flow. This action of Meether completely explained the confusion of the entropy increase and the double-slit experiment.) These newborn particles will then combine to form a larger particle and release their energy and cool down. The combined Set Meether pressure will increase and the Superset Meether will then gradually give its governing power to the new Subset Meether. So the larger a particle is, the less energy it will have, the higher its Meether pressure will be, and the greater its influence. This particle will be more stable and real. The smaller the particle is, the more energy it will have, the lower its Meether pressure will be, the less influence it will have—thereby less stable, and the less real of a matter will be. As a matter of fact, the weird behavior of the microparticle which does not look real and conflicts with our intuition is just this simple. Now we can return to its natural behavior. So, the Copenhagen interpretation and EPR paradox has no contradictions. The main idea is that the microparticles cannot be like the macro matter that totally controls itself. Plus the higher the energy of the particles, the closer it is to Meether. So the particle only exists intermittently and of course it will have uncertainty. If one case of the probability of the wave function prediction appears, the rest of the cases will not exist. This is why it has been agreed as a collapse. Based on this, let’s now specifically look at some intrinsic form of the microparticles, which is the nature that comes with a particle when it’s born.

Spin
We do not have to discuss this further. Note 35 explains it all.

Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Decoherence
The most incredible phenomenon of quantum entanglement is:

…if a pair of particles is generated in such a way that their total spin is known to be zero, and one particle is found to have clockwise spin on a certain axis, then the spin of the other particle, measured on the same axis, will be found to be counterclockwise…It thus appears that one particle of an entangled pair “knows” what measurement has been performed on the other, and with what outcome, even though there is no known means for such information to be communicated between the particles, which at the time of measurement may be separated by arbitrarily large distances…it seemed to violate the speed limit on the transmission of information implicit in the theory of relativity. Einstein famously derided entanglement as “spooky action at a distance”… (Wikipedia, 2015)

This was supposed to be a very incredible and weird phenomenon, but after our rational reasoning above, we can see that this is a natural phenomenon. What is really responsible for this “spooky action at a distance” is actually these particles’ Superset Meether. Besides these particles, this Superset Meether is also controlling the whole entire Set Meether system. Therefore, it must keep the system symmetrical, balanced, and stable at all times. These particles are assigned to the same Superset Meether as when they are generated or when they interact with each other. Naturally, when these particles leave the influence of the Superset Meether and become independent, it shows the renowned phenomenon of Quantum Decoherence.

Wave Particle Duality and Double Slit Experiment

We talked many times of wave particle duality from many angles. With the explanation above, it should be pretty clear. Now let’s focus on the most interesting facet of the double-slit experiment. You open two slits, shoot particles one after another through the double slit board while making sure that at any one time, no two particles entangle. Yet the particle is still entangling it selves to appear wave-like. If there is only one particle, then what is it entangling? This is supposedly unexplainable. Now we know as a fact that in addition to a particle there is also its Set Meether, and the double slit board also has its own Set Meether, plus the set meether of the observer, and their Superset Meethers are in disturbance as long as the particles have a high enough energy. For example, if a C-60 is heated to a very high temperature until it vaporizes, then its Set Meether will have a low enough pressure, insufficient controlling power, then it is really difficult for them not to entangle.

As a master mechanic, I’m busy repairing AC systems everyday. So the books I’ve read is very limited. Over here, I’m like teaching fish to swim, hoping to attract your attention and interest. In quantum mechanics there are lots of laws and definitions that conflict with our intuition. Once we explain it with the Meether concept, we can easily find that it is actually natural. The minds of your audience is as clear as a crystal. Try to do it yourself and you will find it marvelously interesting. Though people do not know the real fact behind all of this weird phenomena that is affected by Meether, through the experimental data, we already derived the mathematical equations to describe its properties and motion. This means we already understand some of the laws of Meether. When we have the Meether concept down its will be just like opening the gates to the secret of nature. What is left for us to do is to wake up, leave the beautiful yet muddled dreamland behind and step over the gates. We will have experience great nature without any mysteries.

34 Please review:
VI. MEETHER AND SET MEETHER
VIII. THE CONVERSION BETWEEN MATTER AND MEETHER

35 Over here we can easily see that when the energy of the Superset Meether drops, the Meether pressure rises above the saturating point, and the speed of some of the subset will settle down to its minimum and no longer wander around within the superset limits, but will instead spin around in a small area in the minimum speed, just like the little eddies in a river. This spinning activity attracts excess mass from the superset which cumulates into matter. Let’s use a familiar example. If a bucket of water is stirred with a stick, particles in the water will converge to a point in the center. If we picture this point as a newborn particle, the bucket of water will then be the particle’s Set Meether. And because Meether has to spin at a minimum speed, then the particle has to follow its activity in an established speed of spin.

PREV | NEXT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *